This solution has been researched solely by the WilsonHCG Innovation team.
Impressions
Strengths and Advantages
(where the solution stands out or shows impact potential)
Structured interviews are ideal for many reasons, but are difficult to manage on a practical level without undue administrative burdens or extensive training for interviewers on the process
Help less experienced interviewers ramp up more quickly
Offers probing questions to keep that process more consistent, as well
Recruiter screens are a stage of the recruitment process that could gain the most benefit from tools that assist with consistency and reduce burdens and negative impacts of high-volume screening
Gaps and Challenges
(things that the solution overlooks or under-delivers on)
Doesn’t allow for in-the-moment notetaking (notes are done at the end), so interviewers may need to spend more time reflecting and making notes after the fact
Can’t add tags for skills or experience that the candidate mentions/demonstrates (not ideal for phone screen stage usage or for building enriched candidate data that’s searchable later
Risks
(anything that could affect ROI; cost, complexity, process gaps, etc.)
Since adding tags isn’t yet a feature, transcription accuracy is the main risk for whether or not the transcription can be used as a searchable data point down the road within a CRM/ATS for candidate rediscovery
Considerations
(potential use cases, impact, deployment scale, company size, etc.)
Not the fastest to implement 6-8 weeks roughly or flexible in how you use it, but could work well for high-volume hiring projects
Light solution for clients who may be considering implementing a process for structuring interviews
Overview of Solutions and Features
Resources and Collateral
Links
URL | Description |
---|---|
Screenshots, Images, and Attachments (paste/upload into boxes below)